Selling Haunted Houses Involves Concerns for Lawsuits Alleging Failure of Disclosure

Question: Are sellers legally obligated to disclose if a house is haunted?

Answer: While it's unlikely a seller will face legal action specifically for a haunted house, full disclosure about the property's conditions is wise to avoid potential disputes. Providing transparency can protect against risks associated with stigmas affecting property values, as highlighted in McGrath v. MacLean, [1979 CanLII 1691] and 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association, [2013 ONSC 5401].

Is the Seller of a House Required to Tell the Buyer That the House Is Haunted?

Although It Is Unlikely That a Seller Would Be Sued Subsequently Spreading Rumours That a House Was Haunted a Seller Can Best Avoid Hassles By Providing Full Disclosure to Buyer and Refraining Making Comments That May Stigmatize the Property.

Understanding the Law Regarding Disclosure Obligations When Selling a House Perceived As Haunted

In the case of 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association et al, 2013 ONSC 5401, a seller was subsequently sued by the buyer when the seller spread rumours that the house was haunted and that such was a detail the seller failed to previously disclose to the buyer.  Subsequently, the buyer brought at a lawsuit and alleged that the haunted house rumour caused reduced realty value due to the stigma arising from such a rumour as well as for the failure of the seller to disclose the haunted status during the sales negotiations with the buyer.

The Law

As for proper disclosure of defects or other concerns during real estate negotiations, a seller is obligated to inform the buyer of any latent defects that may be dangerous or otherwise make the premises unfit for the intended use. This law was established within McGrath v. MacLean et al., 1979 CanLII 1691, and subsequently followed by many cases.

In regards to failing to disclose that a house is haunted, in the 1784773 Ontario Inc. case, it was determined that whereas the haunted house statements were made jokingly and whereas the buyer was unable to provide proof that the house was haunted, the case was dismissed.  Accordingly, whether would find a seller liable if evidence of paranormal activity was available remains unknown.  In another legal dispute regarding a haunted house, the case of Manitoba Free Press v. Nagy, [1907] S.C.R. 340, was reviewed by the Supreme Court of Canada following allegations of that a newspaper for published an article containing suggestions that a vacant house was haunted.

Summary Comment

The chances of getting sued for spreading a rumour that a house is haunted is slim, a former owner of a house should avoid spreading rumours that may adversely affect the value of the property. A seller limits the risk of legal trouble by providing proper disclosure during the selling process and thereafter keeping quiet.