Selling Haunted Houses

Question: Are sellers legally obligated to disclose if a house is haunted?

Answer: While it's unlikely a seller will face legal action specifically for a haunted house, full disclosure about the property's conditions is wise to avoid potential disputes. Providing transparency can protect against risks associated with stigmas affecting property values, as highlighted in McGrath v. MacLean, [1979 CanLII 1691] and 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association, [2013 ONSC 5401].

Does the Seller of a House Need to Disclose That the House Is Haunted to the Buyer?

While It Is Unlikely That a Lawsuit About Whether a House Is Haunted Would Succeed In Court, It Is Always Best That a Seller Provides Full Disclosure to a Buyer and Then Refrain From Stating Anything That May Stigmatize a Property.

Understanding the Law Regarding Disclosure Obligations When Selling a House Perceived As Haunted

In the case of 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association et al, 2013 ONSC 5401, a seller was subsequently sued by the buyer when the seller spread rumours that the house was haunted and that such was a detail the seller failed to previously disclose to the buyer.  Subsequently, the buyer brought at a lawsuit and alleged that the haunted house rumour caused reduced realty value due to the stigma arising from such a rumour as well as for the failure of the seller to disclose the haunted status during the sales negotiations with the buyer.

The Law

On the issue of proper disclosure within realty transactions, the law in Canada appears clear that the seller has a duty to disclose to the buyer any latent defects in the property that may pose a danger or make the house uninhabitable.  This rule was established by the Ontario Court of Appeal in the case of McGrath v. MacLean et al., 1979 CanLII 1691.

In regards to failing to disclose that a house is haunted, in the 1784773 Ontario Inc. case, it was determined that whereas the haunted house statements were made jokingly and whereas the buyer was unable to provide proof that the house was haunted, the case was dismissed.  Accordingly, whether would find a seller liable if evidence of paranormal activity was available remains unknown.  Another interesting case involving a haunted house, was the Manitoba Free Press v. Nagy, [1907] S.C.R. 340, decision of the Supreme Court of Canada which involved allegations of negligence against a newspaper for publishing an article suggesting that a vacant house was haunted and thereby causing a reduction in the property value of the house.

Summary Comment

Although the likelihood of being sued for spreading rumours that a house is haunted is unlikely, sellers, among others, are best to avoid the risk of a legal hassle by providing full disclosure when selling a property. Subsequently, avoiding the spread of rumours about the property is wise.